🔗 Share this article

Families whose relatives buried in resting places at risk from shoreline retreat say that indecision over how to address the issue is creating unnecessary distress about the final resting places of their departed family.

An Impending Threat to Ancient Graveyards

Local authorities have singled out three church graveyards in the villages of Happisburgh, Trimingham, and Mundesley as being in danger of being consumed by the ocean in the next few generations.

A recent report on the issue details a series of options, from taking no action to exhuming remains and relocating them in safer sites. Officials maintain it is for the community to decide how to move forward.

“Right now we’re in limbo. It upsets me. My parents wanted this to serve as their final resting place, but it won't be because of the encroaching sea.”

Estimates suggest at least a portion of one churchyard could be claimed by the waves in the next 80 years, but some residents fear it will happen much sooner. “In my view it’s got under 20 years, if you look at what’s happened in the last 30 years,” one said.

Haunted by the Ghosts of Eccles

One resident remembered a childhood visit to the neighbouring settlement of Eccles, which has almost entirely disappeared into the water, including its place of worship and burial ground.

“It was possible to see human remains,” she said. “Certain people hold this romantic idea that the deceased will just get carried away to sea. That is not the case. People will take bones as mementos and go grave robbing looking for valuables. It’s completely disrespectful.”

“I fear that the same thing that befell at Eccles will occur at Happisburgh and there’ll be bones on the shore. I would feel disgusted by that.”

A Paratrooper's Grave in Jeopardy

Along the shoreline is situated the grave of a ex-soldier who died while working overseas. His parent expressed she lost sleep after learning her child's final plot might one day be relocated.

“It truly disturb me to consider this won’t be his permanent resting place,” she said. “To our family it’s an important site to visit.”

In her view, new interments should stop but says it is premature to exhume current plots. “What I would choose for now is to take no action and watch carefully, but an early decision needs to be made when a tipping point has been attained.”

Seeking Solutions and Clarity

The lack of consensus over when and how to tackle the problem has resulted in grieving relatives feeling exasperated and anxious.

Some want more coastal protections to slow the unavoidable loss and to allow burials to continue for now. Others argue the moment for moving graves is approaching.

“It is very emotive,” said one relative. “The official study was really good, but now there’s uncertainty about how it is implemented. And all parties is avoiding responsibility over who is accountable.”

A local official said the graveyards were owned and managed of the church authorities. “Ultimately it is down to them to decide the direction to take. Our role is here to help support them through that process with residents.”

He added there was ample time to weigh all the options. “We are talking decades before it begins getting lost.”

“Currently, there exists no unified opinion on what should happen yet. We need good community discussions to find the right solutions for each community.”

The prospect of losing the churches and graveyards was described as one of “profound sorrow for the local community,” but church representatives also referenced a doctrine in resurrection, providing a theological perspective on the physical loss of hallowed earth.